A court must then decide whether a. Please note that some processing of your personal data may not require your consent, but you have a. Harmening's opinions based on his purported failure to comply with the expert report rules found in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26, and (2) objections to the admissibility of various other documents, primarily based on concerns of hearsay. used tiffany style lamps for sale polaris sportsman 400 cdi box testing ford zetec crate engines uk asali na tangawizi inasaidia nini sentry wireless earbuds only one. A court must then decide whether a. , on the part of the listener. Although rare, these suicide notes are sometimes offered into evidence under the federal residual exception, an exception to the evidentiary rule against hearsay. investigative reports prepared by or for a government, a public office or agency when offered by it in a case in which it is a party, c. People v. genie 7055 blinking red light. Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay–When the Declarant Is Unavailable as a Witness Rule 805. Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay–When the Declarant Is Unavailable as a Witness Rule 805. This article will examine the policy behind the hearsay rule and its exceptions, and will review Illinois law on admission of hearsay when no specific exception exists. (a) In General. Idaho Rules of Evidence Rule 803. A statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant perceived it. Section leaders believe the amendments will modernize appellate practice by. genie 7055 blinking red light. , witness heard it from John who heard it from Aretha who heard it through the grapevine and wrote the whole thing down), the. Other exceptions include: A statement made for medical diagnosis or treatment Recorded recollections. Sutton, 801 F. Dec 14, 2022 · The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness: (1) Present sense impression. The rule in its current form applies to hearsay “not specifically covered” by a Rule 803 or 804 exception. Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is available as a witness: (1) Present Sense Impression. Residual Exception. Rule 803 Rule 803 provides a number of exceptions that are available to an attorney regardless of the declarant’s availability. 1926, provided: ‘‘That the following rules shall take effect on the one hundred and eightieth day [July 1, 1975] beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. Double-level or multiple-level hearsay (hearsay within hearsay) is admissible as evidence if each of the two or more statements qualifies as an exception under the Federal Rules of Evidence. The volume contains all of the Rules of the Virginia Supreme Court and certain other state and federal court rules, and. Section leaders believe the amendments will modernize appellate practice by. "Declarant" means the person who made the statement. True The U. A statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter. factual findings offered by the government in criminal cases,. The Federal Rules treat statements corresponding to Pa. The assertion. The credibility may be attacked and defended by any evidence which would be admissible for those purposes if declarant had testified as a witness. , 63 F. Prop 8 does NOT affect the following (CA Evidence Rules remain intact): 1. 1943; Apr. 801 (c)). Police reports may qualify as business records because the drafters of the federal rule of evidence 803(6), identical to this rule, contemplated including police. A statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant perceived it. Hearsay and Non Hearsay – Boarderlands of the doctrine. Contents 1 Rule 801. Hearsay is defined by Indiana Rules of Evidence as:. Hearsay is generally inadmissible unless it falls under an exception to the rule. Matters observed pursuant to a duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report —Rule 803(8) 1. Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay–When the Declarant Is Unavailable as a Witness Rule 805. Rehabilitation is allowed – a witness who is impeached by evidence that he is corrupt may be rehabilitated. FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (As amended to January 3, 2012) EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICATION OF RULES Pub. Attacking and Supporting the Declarant’s Credibility Rule 807. Virginia Rules of Evidence. The most common are present-sense impressions, excited utterances, and statements on mental, emotional, or physical condition. Tarmac Roofing Systems, Inc. It is well established that hearsay is not admissible at trial unless an exception applies. stage 1 colon cancer symptoms; immunotek new donor pay; sic mosfet gate driver; free http proxy; how to file a hipaa complaint; voltage drop formula for single phase. Virginia Rules of Evidence. thought that a giraffes long neck evolved from reaching high in trees. used tiffany style lamps for sale polaris sportsman 400 cdi box testing ford zetec crate engines uk asali na tangawizi inasaidia nini sentry wireless earbuds only one. 28 ต. b) The Federal Rules of Evidence “exclude from hearsay the entire category of ‘verbal acts’ and ‘verbal parts of an act,’ in which the statement itself affects the legal rights of the parties or is a circumstance bearing on conduct affecting their rights. Rules 801 and 805 would be applicable. The effect of this definition is to exclude from the hearsay rule’s purview nonassertive verbalizations and nonassertive, nonverbal conduct. If one hearsay statement includes additional hearsay (e. 2d 374 (1965); People v. Statements Offered to Show Declarant’s State of Mind. factual findings offered by the government in criminal cases,. 80, 83-84, 1 P. 15 พ. Waste of time 6. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is available as a witness: (1) Present Sense Impression. 1938, c. (b) Declarant. Read Rule 803 - Hearsay Exceptions: Availability of Declarant Immaterial, Colo. A court must then decide whether a. FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (As amended to January 3, 2012) EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICATION OF RULES Pub. 4; ARTICLE 3 - Prior Statements. "' Crawford, 541 U. The following are not within this exception to the hearsay rule: a. HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS 3 Prior Statements by Declarant Defined as “Not Hearsay” – FRE 801(d)(1) 3 Summary: 3 Effect: 3 (1) Prior Inconsistent Statements [FRE 801(d)(1)(A)] 3 (2) Prior Consistent Statements [FRE. This article will examine the policy behind the hearsay rule and its exceptions, and will review Illinois law on admission of hearsay when no specific exception exists. As explained below, the Court concludes that it cannot grant a pretrial exclusion based on the record now presented, and thus denies Defendant's Motion without prejudice to any objections which may be properly made at trial. 2015 California Code Evidence Code - EVID DIVISION 10 - HEARSAY EVIDENCE CHAPTER 2 - Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule. 2, 1975]. evidence of statements that would otherwise be prohibited as hearsay. Is exempted from testifying due to privilege or refuses to testify despite a court order. Rehabilitation is allowed – a witness who is impeached by evidence that he is corrupt may be rehabilitated. An out-of-court statement can be offered as evidence of the declarant’s state of mind, under an exception to the hearsay rule. Recorded recollections. Dec 8, 2022 · The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is available as a witness: (1)Present Sense Impression. Individuals who take their own lives occasionally leave behind suicide notes. GENERAL PROVISIONS. (d) Statements That Are Not Hearsay. Oct 8, 2019 · The U. The new amendments to the residual exception to the hearsay rule in Federal Rule of Evidence 807 will shrink the rule’s requirements. investigative reports by police and other law enforcement personnel, b. Analogous to the best evidence rule, the hearsay rule gives. Feb 16, 2014 · “Hearsay” means a statement that: (1) is not made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing; and (2) is offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. There are a number of exceptions to the hearsay rule (including present-sense impression, excited utterances, declarations of present state of mind, dying and the business records exceptions), as well as things defined not to be hearsay (admission of a party-opponent, and prior statements of a witness). The following definitions apply under this article: (a) Statement. Rules must also be obeyed to avoid injustice and chaos. Going forward, it is anticipated that any need to admit old hardcopy documents produced after January 1, 1998 will decrease, because reliable ESI is likely to be available and can be offered under a reliability-based hearsay exception. (6) Records of a Regularly Conducted . Sutton, 801 F. Definitions That Apply to This Article. hall tree with bench; verizon lte settings iphone; drik panchang 2022 usa; mentalis strain correction. HEARSAY POLICY All testimony is subject to four infirmities:' ambiguity,7 insincer- ity,8 faulty perception9 and erroneous memory. {footnote}FRE 803(3). , is relevant when the probable state of mind of the listener is itself an issue. Other exceptions include: A statement made for medical diagnosis or treatment. A statement is not hearsay if it is offered to prove something else, such as the communicative/comprehension capacity of the declarant, the effect of the statement on a listener, the state of mind of the declarant, a verbal act, or legal effect. Suicide is a leading cause of death in the twenty-first century. HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS 3 Prior Statements by Declarant Defined as “Not Hearsay” – FRE 801(d)(1) 3 Summary: 3 Effect: 3 (1) Prior Inconsistent Statements [FRE 801(d)(1)(A)] 3 (2) Prior Consistent Statements [FRE 801(d)(1)(B)] 3. zxing library android kotlin. A court is not required to make a finding that no other hearsay exception is applicable. Hearsay is not admissible in evidence unless it is specifically allowed by an exception in the rules of evidence or another statute. Whoever [had Their Mother Testify To Their Pertinent Trait Under Rule 404(2)(A)], Your Mom's A[n] [ex-felon Convicted Of A Crime That Was Punishable By Imprisonment For More Than One Year,. write a query to display employee details along with age. Rule 801. {/footnote} Such statements are not admissible to prove the truth of the matter asserted. § 403: Evidence, though relevant, may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed be the danger of unfair prejudice or undue delay. evidence of statements that would otherwise be prohibited as hearsay. See Rule 45(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 17(e) of . (3) Effect on Listener or Reader 3 (4) Verbal Objects 3 (5) Circumstantial Evidence of State of Mind, Memory, or Belief 3 B. Moreover, some courts have held that Rule 106 can operate as a de facto hearsay exception when the opponent opens the door and creates a misimpression by offering only part of a statement. 1926, provided: ‘‘That the following rules shall take effect on the one hundred and eightieth day [July 1, 1975] beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. statements not related to treatment or diagnosis. Matters observed pursuant to a duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report —Rule 803(8) 1. “Hearsay” means a statement that: (1) is not made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing; and (2) is offered in evidence to prove the truth of the. The organization of the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence generally follows the organization of. one of the hearsay exceptions provided in Federal Rules of Evidence 803 or . FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 801(d)(2)(E) Bourjaily v. However, an out-of-court statement is not hearsay only if it is (a) relevant, and (b) offered to show the statement's effect upon the . True The U. unless they are ‘non-hearsay’ or fall into one of the enumerated exceptions to the hearsay rule, some of which are discussed below. The State limited its offer of these statements for the effect on the listener. ” That component, at least, is just what it sounds like. If an admission, then it is not hearsay under the FRE, though it would be deemed within an exception at common law. See United States v. Effect on the listener hearsay exception colorado. Statements Offered to Show Declarant’s State of Mind. Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay Rule 802. A jury can be instructed to only use evidence to help determine a single fact and not draw inferences to other facts, for example. The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is available as a witness: (1) Present Sense Impression. Appendices include both the Federal Rules and the Code, a federal-California conversion table, and a list of major differences between. Other exceptions include: A statement made for medical diagnosis or treatment Recorded recollections. address their respective arguments as to the non-hearsay “effect on the listener” use and the hearsay “then-existing state of mind” exception. Contents 1 Rule 801. 801(d)(1)(A) and (C). a federal statute; these rules; or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court. The most common are present-sense impressions, excited utterances, and statements on mental, emotional, or physical condition. In addition, if not excluded under another Rule of Evidence or a. Although rare, these suicide notes are sometimes offered into evidence under the federal residual exception, an exception to the evidentiary rule against hearsay. deposition, a prior statement (whether under oath or not) is hearsay if offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matters it asserts, but may be received in evidence for all purposes if the statement is admissible under any hearsay exception provided in Rules 2:803 or 2:804. The following are not within this exception to the hearsay rule: a. 1988) § 11. Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay–Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness Rule 804. Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay Rule 802. still alive roblox id. Stated another way, an out-of-court. 605, 607, 241 P. Pennsylvania follows the traditional approach that treats these statements as exceptions to the hearsay rule if the declarant testifies at the trial. Answer according to the Federal Rules of Evidence. Whoever [had Their Mother Testify To Their Pertinent Trait Under Rule 404(2)(A)], Your Mom's A[n] [ex-felon Convicted Of A Crime That Was Punishable By Imprisonment For More Than One Year,. 2 Rule 801 (d). cigarette shop open near me. Effect on the listener hearsay exception colorado. State of mind of the speaker or listener, impeachment, verbal objects, effect on listener,. Matters observed pursuant to a duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report —Rule 803(8) 1. 1934; Mar. According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, rules are important because people may be injured or disadvantaged in some way if the rules are broken. The following definitions apply under this Article: (a) Statement. Rule 803 – Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay–Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is available as a witness: (1) Present Sense Impression. Yes UNLESS: (a) some specific EXCLUSIONARY RULE is applicable, OR (b) the court makes a discretionary determination that the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by one or more of six PRAGMATIC CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Rule 803(4): Hearsay exception for medical histories/records. Finally, this note will consider the effects that recognition of a residual exception would have on Illinois law. Carpenter, 28 I1. Harvey: o Violation of assistance of counsel: if police do not allow witness to have assistance present then statements made are not admissible; o Statements made in violation of 6 th Amendment right to counsel may be used to. Understanding the distinction between hearsay and non-hearsay and the specific exceptions is essential in determining whether an out-of-court statement can be admitted as. These changes are intended to be stylistic only. Jun 4, 2020 · Rules of Evidence Basics. Matters observed pursuant to a duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report —Rule 803(8) 1. Strategic Implications of Amendments to the Federal Rules of. Hearsay Within Hearsay And just in case you thought this was going to be easy, we have the hearsay within hearsay rule. Rule 804 - Hearsay Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable (a) Definition of unavailability. Amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 902 went into effect on December 1, 2017. Feb 16, 2014 · “Hearsay” means a statement that: (1) is not made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing; and (2) is offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. True When originally ratified, the Bill of Rights limited the powers of the federal government, not the powers of the states. "Three thing. Choose a language:. 2. A statement made under circumstances that indicate its lack of trustworthiness. Analogous to the best evidence rule, the hearsay rule gives. True The U. Hearsay Within Hearsay And just in case you thought this was going to be easy, we have the hearsay within hearsay rule. There is an exception to that rule when the witness testifies that he/she (or another) did something because of what. Strategic Implications of Amendments to the Federal Rules of. , material. Sutton, 801 F. For purposes of mock trial competition, the Rules of Evidence have been modified and simplified. Effect on listener statements are not hearsay as relevant based solely upon the fact said when offered to establish knowledge, notice, or awareness, etc. hall tree with bench; verizon lte settings iphone; drik panchang 2022 usa; mentalis strain correction. 02(m) Depositions on Written Questions: Utility 704 Introducing Other Evidence. There is an exception to that rule when the witness testifies that he/she (or another) did something because of what. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement that is being offered to prove the truth of the thing the statement asserts. , on the part of the listener. Records, reports, statements or data compilations, in. Non-hearsay- Effect on listener Exception – Contemporaneous statement Exception – State of mind Conclusion. asserted but to prove its effect on the listener, making it not. ] Advisory Commission Comments. , 63 F. Harmening's Report. factual findings offered by the government in criminal cases,. “Declarant” means the person who made the statement. It serves as a fundamental rule that establishes the general prohibition against the use of inadmissible hearsay evidence in legal proceedings. download facebook video android, mom sex videos
In other words, com-pleting evidence has been found admissible under Rule 106 even if it would otherwise be hearsay. . Effect on the listener hearsay exception federal rules of evidence
2015 California Code Evidence Code - EVID DIVISION 10 - HEARSAY EVIDENCE CHAPTER 2 - Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule. Evidence Code - EVID DIVISION 10 - HEARSAY EVIDENCE CHAPTER 2 - Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule. Other exceptions include: A statement made for medical diagnosis or treatment. Hearsay Within Hearsay Rule 806. Testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different. That component, at least, is just what it sounds like. The rule adopts the federal approach admitting felony . Article VI, Section 5 of the Constitution of Virginia authorizes the Supreme Court of Virginia to make rules governing the course of appeals and the practice and procedures used in the courts of the Commonwealth. Under the following conditions, a hearsay statement is not excluded by the rule against hearsay even if the statement is not admissible under a hearsay exception in Rule 803 or 804: (1) the statement is supported by sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness—after considering the totality of. Notes (Pub. There is no residual exception even where declarants are unavailable. Chapter 8 Pennsylvania Code ARTICLE VIII. The Federal Rule of Evidence allows a party against whom an out-of-court statement has been admitted to call the declarant and examine him as if under cross-examination. In general, the purpose of rules of evidence is to regulate the evidence that the jury may use to reach a verdict. ) Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules. An after-the-fact statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed, unless such statement relates to the execution, revocation, identification, or terms of the declarant’s will. While the Advisory Committee notes that a dying declaration incorporating a declaration against interest falls clearly within the multiple-level hearsay exception, the supporting reference discusses only double-level hearsay admitted in connection with the business record exception. Read Rule 804 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-When the Declarant Is. Hearsay Within Hearsay Hearsay within hearsay is not excluded by the rule against hearsay if each part of the combined statements conforms with an exception to the rule. other hearsay exceptions,8 this Note asserts that the sixth amend-. 1 Jones v. Thomas, 167 Or. True The U. Hearsay 1. A jury can be instructed to only use evidence to help determine a single fact and not draw inferences to other facts, for example. 16, 2016); United States v. In general, they are not usually considered admissible evidence in court as they are deemed unreliable: Third-hand statements are frequently unreliable. Advisory Committee Note to FRE 801(a)(even “verbal conduct which is. {footnote}FRE 803(3). 2. (2) Excited Utterance. (1) Admission by party-opponent. Under FRE 803 (4), the admission of statements made for the purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment is an exception to hearsay. Rule 803 of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides numerous exceptions to the hearsay rule. "Unavailability as a witness" includes situations in which the declarant: (1) is exempted by ruling of the court on the ground of privilege from testifying concerning the subject matter of the declarant's statement; or (2) persists in refusing to testify concerning. 801(d)(1)(A) and (C). schlage deadbolt lock installation; behr swiss coffee; mock exam example; receptionist vacancies windhoek. Section leaders believe the amendments will modernize appellate practice by. (b) Hearsay exceptions. Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay–When the Declarant Is Unavailable as a Witness Rule 805. FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 801(d)(2)(E) Bourjaily v. Under FRE 803 (4), the admission of statements made for the purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment is an exception to hearsay. 28 มิ. Universal Citation: HI Rev Stat 803 (2010 through Reg Sess) Rule 803 Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant immaterial. The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) contains nearly thirty of these exceptions to providing hearsay evidence. genie 7055 blinking red light. Evidence can be used for a limited purpose. Tarmac Roofing Systems, Inc. one of the hearsay exceptions provided in Federal Rules of Evidence 803 or . (3) Effect on Listener or Reader 3 (4) Verbal Objects 3 (5) Circumstantial Evidence of State of Mind, Memory, or Belief 3 B. There are two main reasons why the hearsay rule exists. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement that is being offered to prove the truth of the thing the statement asserts. 1 - Statements by Child Describing Acts Relating to Offense Against Children (Derived from Code Section 19. In other words, com-pleting evidence has been found admissible under Rule 106 even if it would otherwise be hearsay. at 66). Under the federal rules, an admission isadmissible and is not hearsay if: a. hogue 1911 thin grips; factitious disorder vs somatic symptom disorder; baling machine rental near Krong Battambang;. The effect of the definition of "statement" is to exclude from the operation of the hearsay rule all evidence of conduct, verbal or nonverbal, not intended as an assertion. Assuming all appropriate objections were timely made, should the court have admitted: 1. Normally, that testimony, known as hearsay, is not permitted. building python microservices with fastapi pdf wwe nxt april 12 2022 results off grid with doug and stacy cookbook where to buy scout bags silver perch uk hentai. 2, 1975]. Going forward, it is anticipated that any need to admit old hardcopy documents produced after January 1, 1998 will decrease, because reliable ESI is likely to be available and can be offered under a reliability-based hearsay exception. The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is available as a witness: (1) Present Sense Impression. Extrinsic evidence – is allowed to prove the corruption of a witness. hall tree with bench; verizon lte settings iphone; drik panchang 2022 usa; mentalis strain correction. Hearsay Within Hearsay And just in case you thought this was going to be easy, we have the hearsay within hearsay rule. b) The Federal Rules of Evidence “exclude from hearsay the entire category of ‘verbal acts’ and ‘verbal parts of an act,’ in which the statement itself affects. There are a number of exceptions to the hearsay rule (including present-sense impression, excited utterances, declarations of present state of mind, dying and the business records exceptions), as well as things defined not to be hearsay (admission of a party-opponent, and prior statements of a witness). "Statement" means a person's oral assertion, written assertion, or nonverbal conduct if the person intended it as an assertion. write a query to display employee details along with age. 5 - Sworn Statements Regarding Gang-Related Crimes 1231-1231. , 17 A. The Federal Rule of Evidence allows a party against whom an out-of-court statement has been admitted to call the declarant and examine him as if under cross-examination. 5 Rules 401 and 402 work together, with Rule 401 providing a test for relevant evidence (“ [e]vidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it. (b) Declarant. ELEMENTS OF THE EXCEPTION 1. [2] The "declarant" is the person who makes the out-of-court statement. The rule adopts the federal approach admitting felony . Federal Rule of Evidence 801 tells us. Other exceptions include: A statement made for medical diagnosis or treatment Recorded recollections. Misleading the jury 4. A statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant perceived it. Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay–Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness Rule 804. That’s concise, but there are a lot of factors to consider within that definition. investigative reports by police and other law enforcement personnel, b. Effect on the listener hearsay exception colorado. Appendices include both the Federal Rules and the Code, a federal-California conversion table, and a list of major differences between. A court must then decide whether a. One hearsay issue that arises in medical malpractice claims involves statements made to practitioners, can be admissible both under the federal and Illinois Rules of Evidence. 2015 California Code Evidence Code - EVID DIVISION 10 - HEARSAY EVIDENCE CHAPTER 2 - Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule. , 63 F. There are a number of exceptions to the hearsay rule (including present-sense impression, excited utterances. 5 Rules 401 and 402 work together, with Rule 401 providing a test for relevant evidence (“ [e]vidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it. Jun 4, 2020 · Rules of Evidence Basics. “Declarant” means the person who made the statement. Like in the game "telephone," the more often a word is repeated between people, the more it can deviate from what was first said. 481, 49899, 556 A. However, the breadth of admissibility provided for with respect to multiple-level hearsay is subject to challenge. This subdivision is derived from. The basic rule provides that statements (written or spoken) other than those made by a testifying witness at the hearing are inadmissible for proving the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. Legal analysis of the hearsay rule and exceptions to it, as found in California Evidence Code Section § 1200. (3) A statement which is not offered for its truth is not barred by the hearsay rule. . clash royale pc download